Undertale's original Kickstarter states that it is a 'traditional role-playing game where no one has to get hurt.' However – traditional is something it definitely isn't. An extremely unique game where you are able to get through the entire game without fighting any monsters, it successfully raised 50 thousand dollars on Kickstarter for the game development and eventually sold. Fall into the underworld and explore a hilarious and heartwarming world full of dangerous monsters. Date a skeleton, dance with a robot, cook with a fishwoman.or destroy everyone where they stand. The future is yours to determine!
I'm going to assume that Rockstar Games and its parent company Take-Two Interactive are not going to tell me how much Red Dead Redemption 2 cost to make.
Muffet, when changing the color of the protagonist's SOUL to purple. Muffet (/ˈmʌfᵻt/) is a miniboss the protagonist encounters in Hotland. She runs a bake sale, being very angry at passers-by who do not purchase anything from it, even though buying something costs 9999 gold. She was a bought-in character during the Kickstarter for the game. 1 Appearance 2 Main Story 2.1 Neutral Route 2.2.
In the works for seven years with a team as high as 1,000 developers, artists, designers, writers, and more, it could very well be the most expensive game of all time. We're probably not going to find out what the budget was, but indulge me, if you will. (If Rockstar tells me how much it cost to make, that would simplify things and I will notify you; Take-Two reports earnings on November 7, but they won't likely address this.)
We only have a few tidbits of information from Rockstar, which shared some details as it tried to defend itself from allegations that it forced employees to work overtime in order to finish the game. Jennifer Kolbe, head of publishing at Rockstar, said in a statement to GamesBeat this week that the company logged 67,000 employee weeks this year, and only 20 percent of the people had to work more than 60 hours in a week, and only 0.4 percent of the time was for people who worked more than 80 hour weeks. Strauss Zelnick, CEO of Take-Two Interactive, told us earlier this year that the company had 4,200 employees across 17 studios, including Rockstar's people.
If those numbers are grounded in reality, then we could take a stab at figuring out how much it cost to make the game, if only for the fun of it. I think the result will be instructive, like how much it costs to make interactive entertainment in comparison to how much it costs to make blockbuster movies. Once we start thinking about these kinds of numbers, we'll begin to appreciate just how big a business Rockstar — and the video game industry — have become.
First, let's try a little math. Let's convert that 67,000 employee weeks, for maybe 11 months of the year, to the number of employee years worked on Red Dead Redemption 2 during 2018. So 67,000 divided by 52 weeks leaves us with 1,288 employee years worked on Red Dead Redemption 2 during 2018. That sounds reasonably accurate, as Rockstar has said it doubled the size of its previous team and the number was over 1,000 people.
Above: Arthur Morgan rides his horse in Red Dead Redemption 2.
Red Dead Redemption 2 has been in production for seven years, but we'll figure it didn't require much of a staff for a couple of years as they conceived the design and the team ramped up.
So instead of seven years, we'll multiply by five years. That gives us 6,442 employee years. To get to the total cost of paying employees who worked on the game, we'll have to multiply it by the average salary that these teams received. Since Rockstar has studios spread throughout the world, it will be hard to figure out this cost. But I'll make a big assumption and say that the average Rockstar salary and associated healthcare costs for the company are about $100,000 a year.
So 6,442 employee years times $100,000 a year gives us a total development cost of $644.2 million across the seven years it took to make Red Dead Redemption 2. I am pretty sure that this is red-dead wrong, because I have no idea if my assumptions are close to the mark. If we look at other costs, Rockstar is probably spending something like $300 million in marketing spending on the game. Again, I have no idea how close to the mark I am, but let's just say that brings the total cost of making and marketing Red Dead Redemption 2 to $944.2 million.
At $40 a copy (using this because of discounting and distribution costs), that means that Rockstar would have to sell around 23.6 million copies to break even with Red Dead Redemption 2. Since the first game sold 15 million copies, I believe that will be doable. Analyst Colin Sebastian of Baird Equity Research estimated that Red Dead Redemption 2 would sell 25 million copies in its first six months.
One report said that the estimated cost of making Grand Theft Auto V was $265 million. Obviously, Rockstar has leveled up its game when it comes to pouring more resources into its biggest projects such as Red Dead Redemption 2. I might add that it is an absolutely amazing game.
And will it make money?
Above: Red Dead Redemption 2 stars Arthur Morgan (left) and gang leader Dutch Van Der Linde. How to download fortnite on a pc.
We know that Red Dead Redemption 2 is not going to be in the red.
Now let's look at the revenues that had to finance that game. We'll assume that Rockstar financed the whole thing itself, rather than its parent company Take-Two Interactive. If you look at the revenue generated from the original Red Dead Redemption, that would stand at about 15 million copies sold. If you multiply that by $40 (assuming the usual price of the game is $60, but many of the games were sold at a discount to that peak price, and there are distribution fees), then you get $600 million in revenue on maybe $300 million in marketing and development costs.
Rockstar also had a lot of revenues from Grand Theft Auto V, which sold more than 100 million copies. Multiply that by $40, and you get $4 billion in revenue. Maybe the marketing costs were $500 million. So Rockstar had something like $4.1 billion in cash to spend on the development of its next major title. I'm not even counting revenue yet from GTA Online, which regularly generates item sales revenue for Rockstar. (Analyst Michael Pachter of Wedbush believes it peaked at $125 million per quarter, and it is about $100 million quarter now). So maybe Rockstar spent $600 million to make Red Dead Redemption 2. It may spend $300 million to market it.
That means Rockstar might only have $3.2 billion left in the bank. And if Red Dead Redemption 2 sells better than the first title, say maybe 25 million copies, then Rockstar could get another $1 billion out of Red Dead Redemption 2 sales. That means that Rockstar will have something like $4.2 billion in the bank, after it covers the costs of making Red Dead Redemption 2. We know from a lawsuit from former GTA V leader Leslie Benzies that top leaders could get a bonus of $150 million. In this case, maybe a couple of the big guys will get that, accounting for another $300 million in costs for the leaders. To put these numbers in perspective, James Cameron's Avatar film, the No. 1 movie of all time, generated $2.7 billion in box office revenues on a budget of about $237 million. Not counting GTA Online and Red Dead Online revenue, Rockstar could have $3.9 billion in the bank.
I haven't seen the revenue figure associated with the ongoing miracle that is GTA Online. And Rockstar has also said that it will launch a Red Dead Online game, and we can assume another version for the PC is coming. Those entities are going to be very useful in financing further blockbuster games. Rockstar itself could very easily double the size of its teams yet again, (as Kolbe said they did on Red Dead Redemption 2) and still come out with plenty of money to make its games.
If you want to play at the highest level of the industry, and if you want to compete with the likes of Rockstar, this is the kind of money you have to put down as your ante. This is a high stakes game of poker. And, to mix our metaphors, you don't want to bring a knife to a gunfight.
It's safe to say that Rockstar will make money from Red Dead Redemption 2. I know that Rockstar demands a lot of work from its employees. I sure hope they give their workers the bonus of a lifetime.
Another view: Michael Pachter, analyst at Wedbush, offered this alternative view which would have very different numbers: 'There are probably 200 full time equivalent employees working on the game, and that has been the case for 8.5 years. At $100,000 per employee, that's $20 million a year times 8.5 years, equals $170 million.'
He added, 'Parts of 1,000 employees worked on it, but not to the exclusion of all else. Take-Two's capitalized software balance is $733 million; that's the amount they've spent on all games that are under development but haven't yet come out. That includes Borderlands, any new 2K games, some of the Private Division games, and all Rockstar games in development (Max Payne, LA Noire, Midnight Club, possibly Agent, Bully, Manhunt). No chance Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80 percent of the total, but it is likely 25 percent.'
[Updated 6:35 pm 10/26/18 with some better estimates on marketing and distribution costs; updated 10/29/18 at 9:18 am with Pacther's view].
[Updated 10:59 a.m. 10/30/18: Rockstar noted that all of the people who contributed to the game are listed on this site. There are around 2,800 names there. Obviously, not everyone worked on the game for seven years.]
VentureBeat
VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital townsquare for technical decision makers to gain knowledge about transformative technology and transact. Our site delivers essential information on data technologies and strategies to guide you as you lead your organizations. We invite you to become a member of our community, to access:- up-to-date information on the subjects of interest to you,
- our newsletters
- gated thought-leader content and discounted access to our prized events, such as Transform
- networking features, and more.
Make Your Own Undertale Character
Caution: Potential Spoilers
Undertale is one of the most highly-praised indie games of 2015. I sincerely believe it will continue to be for years to come. There is so much that creator Toby Fox did correctly when conceptualizing this game, and the story is just one of those things.
Now, I won't spoil the plot for you. I came into this game pretty much blind and I'm glad for that. It made the experience so much more enjoyable when everything was a surprise. However, I will talk about something that added to the overall narrative design of the story: the combat system.
I know what most of you are thinking. What does the combat system have to do with the overall narrative structure of a game? In this case, quite a lot. How to scan a document on hp printer.
Without getting into too much detail, the main story of Undertale revolves around a young child falling into an underground world filled with monsters. To escape, the child must traverse this unknown land and face its ruler. The game also gives the player a choice in how to accomplish that goal. You can either proceed in standard RPG fashion by killing monsters you encounter along the way, gaining XP, acquiring currency, and increasing your LVs, or you can spare every creature and forfeit leveling up and acquiring money from enemies. Proceeding either way gives you a different ending. Both are interesting endings and worth seeing.
Undertale Kickstarter Page
What does the combat system have to do with this? How to activate adobe photoshop cc 2018. Everything. It's another instance of storytelling occurring in the negative space of the game. Undertale sports a unique battle system which combines bullet-hells and reaction time events together in an RPG, turn-based framework. The interesting part is the aspects that are attributed to each type of combat action.
In this game the player attacks are very different from the enemy attacks. While the enemies attack using bullet-hell inspired attacks…
Toby Fox Interview Undertale
…the player attacks using reaction time events.
The former deals with defensive play, while the other highlights offensive play. This seems pretty standard. There are many games that employ the same sort of logic.
In Undertale, the way in which you deal and take damage directly reflects what the developer wants the player to be feeling at those moments. The bullet-hell enemy attacks make you focus on avoidance. You don't want to hurt anybody, but you also need to stay alive. Subtly, the game is telling you that the monsters that are attacking you don't really want to kill you. Their attacks are not directed at you most times; they're just random bullets. So just avoid them. You know you can. Have mercy.
On the other hand, the attack mechanic relies on speed and accuracy. To deal the most damage, you must hit the action button in the center. If you hit too early or too late, you deal less damage and even run the chance of missing the target entirely. There is no room for hesitation. You must focus and strike exactly. This is what you must do to enact a genocide on all the monsters in the Underground.
This is a subtle and elegant way to integrate story into the overall game design. Things like this are what make analyzing story in video games so fun. I highly recommend playing this game, even if you are not intoparticularly into games! Check it out on Steam or download it directly from the developer here.
